Analysis and study of geometrical variability on the performance of junctionless tunneling field effect transistors: Advantage or deficiency?

Document Type: Reasearch Paper


1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.

2 Department of Electrical Engineering, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.


This study investigates geometrical variability on the sensitivity of the junctionless tunneling field effect transistor (JLTFET) and Heterostructure JLTFET (HJLTFET) performance. We consider the transistor gate dielectric thickness as one of the main variation sources. The impacts of variations on the analog and digital performance of the devices are calculated by using computer aided design (CAD) tools. The gate oxide thickness is varied uniformly from right to left and vice versa and the performance of devices are analyzed. It is shown that changes in the geometric dimensions of the devices improves some electrical parameters and degrades others. Finally, we use the oxide thickness variation advantage and implement the oxide pocket close to the drain-channel interface for proposing of the pocket in narrower drain side oxide HJLTFET (PNS-HJLTFET).


Main Subjects


Tunneling Field Effect Transistors (TFETs) have attracted widespread attention in recent years due to low Sub-threshold Slope (SS) and low power consumption. TFETs are also immune to short channel effects (SCEs) because the current mechanism in the TFETs is controlled by the band to band tunneling [1-5]. SS in conventional MOSFETs is limited to values greater than 60 mV/Dec (2.3kT/q), which does not provide high ratios for low power applications (Ion/Ioff). The low ON-state current in silicon TFETs is a major challenge due to poor BTBT rate. In order to improve on current methods such as strain engineering, hetero-structures, low band-gap materials, high-K insulators and nanowires have been employed [6-9]. In contrast, low SS in TFETs can reduce the threshold voltage and device power to values less than 0.5 V. In the term of scaling, random variations in performance of TFETs due to Random Dopant Fluctuation (RDF) may be significant. RDF effects have been reported as unacceptable increases in the OFF-state current [10-11].

The other issue about TFETs is the ambipolar behavior that limits the design of digital circuits. In negative gate biases, an overlap is made between the channel valence band and the drain conduction band. As a result, the electrons tunnels from the channel to drain. In this way, TFETs exhibit a significant current at both the positive and negative biases. To suppress this parasitic behavior, methods such as using Gaussian doping profiles, gate/drain overlap, hetero-structure insulators and gate work function engineering [12-15]. One of the main challenges in experimental realization of steep transistors is the sensitivity of device performance to design parameters. Ideally, the steep transistor should have a high sensitivity to only the gate voltage in the sub threshold region; however, it is shown here that the conventional TFETs have an increased sensitivity to device parameters like the oxide thicknesses. High sensitivity to variability in device parameters reduces the reliability of integrated circuits made from these devices. This issue has been thoroughly investigated in MOSFETS and the main sources of fluctuations including Random Discrete Dopant (RDF), Line Edge Roughness (LER), Poly-silicon granularity and variations in oxide thickness have been studied extensively[16-18]. The same requirements for TFETs are also in place.

All MOSFETs are based on the use of junctions between semiconductors. Because of the laws of diffusion and the statistical nature of the dopant atoms in the semiconductor, the fabricating and formation of ultra-shallow and abrupt junctions with high doping concentration gradients has become an increasingly expensive and difficult. Impurities in such fabrication diffuse from the source/drain to the channel. This problem can be solved with junctionless TFETs (JLTFETs), which have exhibited promising performance for analog and digital applications [19- 21]. From the literature review, it is evident using heterostructure material at source/channel interface is a possible way of improving the performance of TFETs especially ON state current [22-27].

This study investigates the effect of uncertainties in device geometry parameters on its performance. The precise design of the geometric dimensions of the device has a significant impact on its performance. The accuracy of design depends on the technology used. However, some uncertainties in the geometric dimension of the device are inevitable. Of course, the tolerance level is determined by the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor (ITRS). This study considers the uncertainties in gate dielectric thickness. The rest of the paper is organized as follows:

Device structure and simulation method/models will be presented in section 2. In sections 3, DC characteristics of devices and Strategy of studying the parameters variations will be discussed. Also In section 3 performance of studied devices will be analyzed and a structure will be proposed. Finally conclusion of this report will be presented in section 4.


Device structures and simulations

A 2D-structure of junction less tunneling field effect transistor (JLTFET) is illustrated in Fig. 1. Physical characteristics of devices are given in Table 1. Drain, Source and channel regions are uniformly doped with donor dopant at concentrations of 1×1019 cm-3. The SiO2 insulator with a thickness of 2 nm separates the control gate(c-gate) and polarity gate (p-gate) from channel and source. Heterostructure junctionless tunneling field effect transistor (HJLTFET) is formed when the source region is replaced with Germanium. The silicon/germanium body thickness is 5 nm.

SILVACO ATLAS 2D 5.19.20 R is employed for all simulations which uses nonlocal Band to Band Tunneling (BTBT) model to compute tunneling probability at tunneling junction. The tunneling current in the nonlocal BTBT at each point is independent of the electric field and dependent on band structure variation along the device. Because of high-impurity atoms in the channel and due to interface trap effect, the Shockley Read Hall (SRH) and Auger (AUGER) recombination models were included in the simulation. We incorporated the effect of Fermi-Dirac statistics in the calculation of the intrinsic carrier concentration required in the expressions for SRH recombination. Assuming high doping concentration, a band-gap narrowing model (BGN) was also included. Quantum confinement effects on BTBT were induced through the use of the quantum confinement model given by Hansch (HANSCHQM). To include a mobility model into the simulation, the Lombardi mobility model (CVT) also employed. Given the important role of trap-assisted tunneling (TAT) in the sub threshold region, the TAT model given by Schenk (SCHENK.TUN) is enabled. The nonlocal BTBT used in this study calculates electron/hole tunneling probability on the basis of equation (1) which is known as Wetzel-Kramer-Brillouin (WKB) approximation method [28-30].


where m* is the electron effective mass, q is the electron charge, ħ is the reduced Plank constant, () is the screening tunneling length of the barrier that depends on device geometry, Eg denotes the energy band gap, and ∆∅ represents the energetic difference between the valence and conduction bands of tunneling regions. Drain current depends on tunneling probability, which itself is dependent on band structure variation at the interfaces of the channel with source/drain.


DC Characteristics

Applying gate and drain voltages, the band bending in energy band structure will be occurred and tunneling probability rises at regions where the conduction band overlaps with the valence band. In JLTFETs, BTBT may occur in two different manners. The first is the on-state, during which positive gate voltage is applied and an overlap occurs between the conduction band of the channel and the valence band of the source. The second is the ambipolar state, at which negative gate voltage is applied and an overlap occurs between the conduction band of the drain and the valence band of a channel.

In order to calibrate the model, it is necessary to compare the simulation results with the reference data [31]. For this, the parameters used in models, especially nonlocal BTBT, should be modified in order to match the simulation results with reference data. Fig. 2 shows this calibration. A good agreement between simulation and reference results is observed.

The energy band diagram of JLTFET and H-JLTFET in ON and OFF state are shown in Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 3(b) respectively. As we expect, tunneling barrier or tunneling length in ON state decreased at source side in both JLTFET and HJLTFET. It is clear that in the ON state, tunneling length is narrower and electrons can tunnel from valence band of source to conduction band of the channel and the tunneling rate and consequently drain current will be increased. The tunneling barrier reduction in HJLTFET is more due to lower energy band gap of germanium.

The intrinsic gate capacitance is an important parameter for the RF performance analysis especially in calculating cut-off frequency[31-35]we investigate the analog performance of n-type double gate junctionless tunnel field effect transistor (DG-JLTFET. The intrinsic gate capacitance is extracted from small signal AC simulation at frequency of 1 MHz. The total gate capacitance consists of gate to channel capacitance plus gate to source/drain capacitance. The variation of total gate capacitance (Cgg) along with Cgd and Cgs respect to gate voltage are plotted in Fig. 4(a) and Fig. 4(b). It is observed From Fig. 4, that the value of gate capacitance for the HJLTFET is higher than that of the JLTFET for all values of gate voltages. In the HJLTFET, because of lower energy band gap at source side, more carriers can tunnel from the source valence band to the conduction band of the channel. Therefore the population of carriers and consequently the gate capacitance for HJLTFET is more than JLTFET. As the gate voltage increases, the length of the tunneling barrier decreases, which also reduces the Cgs. It is worth noting that in both structures the Cgs is negligible and Cgd is dominant in total gate capacitance. Given that the drain-channel tunneling junction is still inactive at the positive gate voltages, the Cgd increases. This means that the tunneling resistance at drain side increases.

The drain current for two structure is shown in Fig. 5. A more accurate comparison between some important parameters of JLTFET and HJLTFET is shown in Table 2. It can be seen that, except for ambipolar current, other parameters have been improved.

Strategy of studying the geometrical parameters variations

The current study only includes uncertainty in the gate oxide thickness. The effect of uncertainty on the characteristics of the transistor will be discussed. Two approaches are considered as follows:

a-The thickness of the gate oxide decreases uniformly with constant slope from right to left. We refer to this as JLTFET/HJLTFET with Narrower Drain side oxide or briefly ND-JLTFET/ND HJLTFET.

b-The thickness of the gate oxide decreases uniformly with constant slope from the left to right. We refer to this as JLTFET/ HJLTFET with Narrower Source side oxide or briefly NS-JLTFET/NS-HJLTFET.

In both cases, it is assumed that the variation is at most 10% of nominal value. In all simulation steps both two approaches are compared with the base mode which has uniform gate oxide thickness. The aforementioned scenarios are shown in Fig. 6(a) and Fig. 6(b) respectively.

The output characteristic curve of JLTFET/HJLTFET in two aforementioned scenarios along with the base mode is shown in Fig. 7. The HJLTFET demonstrates more ON current for all scenarios in comparison with JLTFET. However only NS-HJLTFET shows improvement in ON current with 8% and other cases cannot improve ON current. Due to no change in drain material, ambipolar current has no significant change.

Based on equation (1), the tunneling length (Λ) depends on the characteristics of the semiconductor material and device geometry and insulator characteristics [36]. The variation arisen from oxide thickness, causes band bending in energy band diagram. As a result the tunneling length and the tunneling rate/current will be changed. In according to simulations results, although the variation in the energy band diagram seems to be negligible, but due to the exponential dependence of the drain current to band bending, changes in tunneling rate and drain current will be significant. Since the tunneling phenomenon is the direct result of changing in the energy band diagram, it seems reasonable to focus analysis on any changes in the shape of this diagram. Based on equation (1), the tunneling length (Λ) depends on the characteristics of the semiconductor material and device geometry and insulator characteristics [28]. The uncertainties caused by the insulating thickness, induces a change in the shape of the energy band diagram. As a result the tunneling length and consequently the tunneling rate/current are changed. In according to simulations results, although the variation in the energy band diagram seems to be negligible, but due to the exponential dependence of the drain current to band bending, changes in tunneling rate and drain current will be significant.

Performance assessment

Some important parameters used in performance assessment are shown in Table 3. A comparative data for aforementioned scenarios and parameters is shown in Fig. 8. The relative change for any parameter shown in Fig. 8 is derived from equation (2), (e.g. for SS):


The off current and ION/IOFF ratio especially in the ND-JLTFET/HJLTFET are more sensitive to variation. For NS-HJLTFET the only parameter which shows severe changes is ambipolar current and the other have no change or even have been improved(e.g. threshold voltage and ION and also ION to IOFF ratio). This implies that NS-HJLTFET can be considered as an advantage not challenge if ambipolar current be suppressed significantly.

Proposed structure

Static and dynamic power dissipation in inverter based logic circuits depend on VDD and OFF state leakage current [37]. Although TFETs are considered as energy efficient devices, but to realize the application of TFETs into circuit level, the ambipolar behavior should be well controlled. Given that the ambipolar current occurs in drain-channel tunnel junction at negative gate bias due to overlap between valance band of channel and conduction band of drain, it is appropriate to reduce the tunneling rate in this junction. In according to Table 4, it seems reasonably to propose a method to compensate the drawback of NS-HJLTFET along with keeping its advantages. If a small area of the gate oxide close to the drain-channel interface is grown thicker, the aforementioned target will be realized. We call this proposal as pocket oxide in NS-HJLTFET (PNS-HJLTFET). The proposed structure is shown in Fig. 9.

Fig. 10(a) shows the effect of the pocket oxide on the energy band diagram of NS-HJLTFET in the ambipolar state. It clearly shows that there is no significant change in tunneling barrier width. This narrowing of tunneling barrier leads to suppression of the ambipolar current.

Fig. 10(b) illustrates the drain current of NS-HJLTFET and PNS-HJLTFET. In order to investigate the effect of geometrical variability on the analog performance, the transconductance variations for all aforementioned cases are shown in the Fig. 10(c). It is seen that NS-HJLTFET has less variation and also PNS-HJLTFET has the largest value of transconductance. Some of the extracted data have been listed in Table 4. The sub-threshold swing (SS) and also threshold voltage (Vt) for all structures are similar. Improvement of ON current for PNS-HJLTFET is 10%. However, the best improvement is seen for OFF current and ION/IOFF. For PNS-HJLTFET, the improvement for OFF current, ION/IOFF is 66.8% and 231% respectively.

For the n-TFET, the ambipolar current is a current due to the narrowing of tunneling barrier width at the channel-drain junction for negative gate bias [37]. This narrowing is due to the accumulation of holes in the channel. As the concentration of the accumulated holes increases, the tunneling barrier width gets narrower leading to a higher ambipolar current. Based on our proposed device which uses pocket oxide at the drain side of the channel, the accumulation of holes decreases and consequently the ambipolar is suppressed. Reduction in the hole concentration at channel near drain is shown in Fig. 11.

One of the important performance metric that corresponds to intrinsic limitations on switching speed and AC operation of a transistor is intrinsic device delay time (τ) [38]. In this study the switching speed is calculated as:


Where Cg is gate capacitance and drain voltage Vd is 1V and ION is on state current of the device. The intrinsic delay time for HJLTFET, NS-HJLTFET and PNS-HJLTFET is shown in Fig. 12. It seen from Fig. 12, the delay time for HJLTFET is more NS-HJLTFET and PNS-HJLTFET for all gate voltages. However by increasing gate voltage NS_HJLTFET and PNS-HJLTFET have the same performance. Power-delay product (PDP) is the switching energy required for ON-OFF transition of a transistor. It is a measure of the dynamic power dissipation. In this study PDP is calculated by [38]:


Power-delay product (PDP) for HJLTFET, NS-HJLTFET and PNS-HJLTFET is shown in Fig. 13. At the low gate voltage the PNS-HJLTFET consumes the least energy for switching, however at higher gate voltages, the PNS-HJLTFET shows the moderate consuming energy in comparison with HJLTFET and NS-HJLTFET.

The output conductance(gd) and the output resistance (RO) of studied devices is calculated by [38]:



The variation of output conductance and resistance with respect to the variation in drain voltage is also shown in Fig. 14. From Fig. 14, we observe that the PNS-HJLTFET has a lower value of output resistance compared to the HJLTFET and NS-HJLTFET, since the output conductance of the PNS-HJLTFET is higher than that of the two others for all values of drain voltages, as observed from the same Figure.

The unity gain frequency is shown in Fig. 15. The PNS-HJLTFET shows more cut-off frequency than HJLTFET. However fT for NS-HJLTFET and PNS-HJLTFET has no meaningful difference. The fT is calculated by [39], we present a detailed performance comparison between conventional n-i-n MOSFET transistors and tunneling field-effect transistors (TFETs:


Where gm is transconductance and Cg is the gate capacitance of the device.


In according to simulation results, the uncertainties arising from the manufacturing process affect the performance of JLTFET and HJLTFETs in analog and digital applications. Though the process variation is avoidable but our study showed this can be considered as an advantage. It have been shown uniform decrease of gate oxide thickness with the same slope from right to the left (ND-JLTFET and ND-HJLTFET) and from left to right (NS-JLTFET and NS-HJLTFET) changed device performance significantly. Due to the extracted curves, the NS-HJLTFET had the best state except to ambipolar current. Therefore a structure namely PNS-HJLTFET was proposed which uses an oxide pocket close to the drain. The simulation results showed the proposed structure suppressed the ambipolar current while keeping other good performance.


The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.


[1]         Seabaugh A. C., Zhang Q., (2010), Low-voltage tunnel transistors for beyond CMOS logic. Proc. IEEE. 98: 2095-2110.

[2]         Choi W. Y., Park B. G., Lee J. D., Liu T. J. K., (2007), Tunneling field-effect transistors (TFETs) with subthreshold swing (SS) less than 60 mV/dec. IEEE Electron Device Lett.28: 743-745.

[3]         Kam H., King-Liu T. J., Alon E., Horowitz M., (2008), Circuit-level requirements for MOSFET-replacement devices in Technical Digest. Int. Electron Devices Meeting IEDM. 55: 48-59.

[4]         Ionescu A. M., Riel H., (2011), Tunnel field-effect transistors as energy-efficient electronic switches. Nature.  479: 329-337.

[5]         Anand S., Sarin R. K., (2016), Analog and RF performance of doping-less tunnel FETs with Si 0.55 Ge 0.45 source. J. Comput. Electron. 15: 850-856.

[6]         Boucart K., Ionescu A. M., (2007), Double-gate tunnel FET with high-K gate dielectric. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 54: 1725-1733.

[7]         Chen Z. X., (2009), Demonstration of tunneling FETs based on highly scalable vertical silicon nanowires. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 30: 754-756.

[8]         Saurabh S., Kumar M. J., (2009), Impact of strain on drain current and threshold voltage of nanoscale double gate tunnel field effect transistor: Theoretical investigation and analysis. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 48: 64503-64508.

[9]         Knoch J., Mantl S., Appenzeller J., (2007), Impact of the dimensionality on the performance of tunneling FETs: Bulk versus one-dimensional devices. Solid. State. Electron. 51: 572-578.

[10]       Damrongplasit N., Kim S. H., Liu T-J. K., (2013), Study of random dopant fluctuation induced variability in the raised-Ge-source TFET. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34: 184-186.

[11]       Ying Zhu Y., (2013), Numerical study on effects of random dopant fluctuation in double gate tunneling FET. IEEE Int. Conf. Elec. Devices Solid-State Circuits. 1-2.

[12]       Rahimiana M., Fathipour M., (2016), N-P-N bipolar action in junctionless nanowire TFET: Physical operation of a modified current mechanism for low power applications. J. Appl. Phys. Article. 120: 225702.

[13]       Kumar M. J., Sahay S., (2016), Controlling BTBT-induced parasitic BJT action in junctionless FETs using a hybrid channel. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 63: 3350-3353.

[14]       Abdi D. B., Jagadesh Kumar M., (2014), Controlling ambipolar current in tunneling FETs using overlapping gate-on-drain. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2: 187-190.

[15]       Rahimian M., Fathipour M., (2016), Junctionless nanowire TFET with built-in N-P-N bipolar action: Physics and operational principle. J. Appl. Phys. 120: 225702-225706.

[16]       Nayak K., Agarwal S., Bajaj M., Oldiges P. J., Muralli K. V. R., Rao V. R., (2014), Metal-Gate granularity-induced threshold voltage variability and mismatch in Si Gate-All-Around nanowire n-MOSFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 61: 3892-3895.

[17]       Bajaj M., Nayak K., Gundapaneni G., Rao V. R., (2016), Effect of metal gate granularity induced random fluctuations on Si Gate-All-Around nanowire MOSFET 6-T SRAM cell stability. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 15:  243-247.

[18]       Yu T., Wang R., Huang R., (2010), Simulation of line-edge roughness effects in silicon nanowire MOSFETs. in 2010 Int. Conf. Simulation of Semiconductor Proc. Devices. 187-190.

[19]       Lee C. W., Afzalian A., Akhavan N. D., Yan R., Ferain I., Colinge J. P., (2009), Junctionless multigate field-effect transistor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94: 53511-53516.

[20]       Colinge J. P., (2010), Nanowire transistors without junctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5: 225-229.

[21]       Colinge J. P., (2011), Junctionless transistors: Physics and properties. in Media. no. Umr 5130, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 187-200.

[22]       Rahimian M., Fathipour M., (2016), Junctionless nanowire TFET with built-in N-P-N bipolar action: Physics and operational principle. J. Appl. Phys. 120: 22-28.

[23]       Balaz D., (2011), Current collapse and device degradation in AlGaN/GaN heterostructure field effect transistors. PhD dissertation, University of Glasgow.

[24]       Daumiller I., Kirchner C., Kamp M., Ebeling K. J., Kohn E., (1999), Evaluation of the temperature stability of AlGaN/GaN heterostructure FETs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 20: 448–450.

[25]       Ambacher O., (1999), Two-dimensional electron gases induced by spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization charges in N- and Ga-face AlGaN/GaN heterostructures. J. Appl. Phys. 85:3222-3233.

[26]       Tzeng S., (2017), Low-frequency noise sources in III-V semiconductor heterostructures-susie tzeng - google books.

[27]       Aghandeh H., Ali S., Ziabari S., (2017), Gate engineered heterostructure junctionless TFET with Gaussian doping pro fi le for ambipolar suppression and electrical performance improvement. Superlatt.  Microstruct. 111: 103-114.

[28]       Simon M. S., Kwok K. Ng, (2014), Physics of semiconductor devices. 10. Wiley-Interscience.

[29]       Schenk A., (1993), Rigorous theory and simplified model of the band-to-band tunneling in silicon. Solid State Electron. 36: 19-34.

[30]       Takayanagi M., Iwabuchi S., (1991), Theory of band-to-band tunneling under nonuniform electric fields for subbreakdown leakage currents. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 38: 1425-1431.

[31]       Ahish S., Sharma D., Vasantha M. H., Kumar Y. B. N., (2017), Performance analysis of InGaAs/GaAsP heterojunction double gate tunnel field effect transistor. Superlatt. Microstruct. 103: 93-101.

[32]       Akram M. W., Ghosh B., (2014), Analog performance of double gate junctionless tunnel field effect transistor. J. Semicond. 35: no. 7.

[33]       Cecil K., Singh J., (2017), Influence of Germanium source on dopingless tunnel-FET for improved analog/RF performance. Superlatt. Microstruct. 101: 244-252.

[34]       Anand S., Sarin R. K., (2017), Dual material gate doping-less tunnel FET with hetero gate dielectric for enhancement of analog/RF performance. J. Semicond. 38: 1-7.

[35]       Li W., Liu H., Wang S., Chen S., (2016), Analog/RF performance of four different Tunneling FETs with the recessed channels. Superlatt. Microstruct. 100: 1238-1248.

[36]       Mojumder N. N., Roy K., (2009), Band-to-Band tunneling ballistic nanowire FET: Circuit-Compatible device modeling and design of Ultra-Low-Power digital circuits and memories. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 56: 2193-2201.

[37]       Garg S., Saurabh, S., (2017), Suppression of ambipolar current in tunnel FETs using drain-pocket: Proposal and analysis. Superlatt. Microstruct. 113: 261-270.

[38]       Taur Y., Ning T. H., (2002), Fundamentals of modern VLSI devices. Cambridge. 2nd Edition. 25: ISBN 978-0-521-83294-6. 1.

[39]       Koswatta S. O., Lundstrom M. S.,  Nikonov D. E., (2009), Performance comparison between p-i-n tunneling transistors and conventional MOSFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 56: 456-465.